1. We certainly aren't, though the catch was to do so in moderation. But it was always far easier to not partake unless there was reason to do so. Which mainly was, say, a glass of wine at dinner or at a family gathering.
2. Fiddleford? Formerly human, currently human, while we certainly did not embrace cannibalism, the fact that that was something historically done and was still being done in some cultures with little medical repercussions, it's merely morality that finds it wrong. Not that I would have done that outside of here, of course, but it is an interesting thought experiment at the very least. When the other option is losing the ability to control yourself, it certainly is a lesser of two evils scenario.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
momijizukamori
no subject
Date: 2023-05-03 01:45 pm (UTC)2. Fiddleford? Formerly human, currently human, while we certainly did not embrace cannibalism, the fact that that was something historically done and was still being done in some cultures with little medical repercussions, it's merely morality that finds it wrong. Not that I would have done that outside of here, of course, but it is an interesting thought experiment at the very least. When the other option is losing the ability to control yourself, it certainly is a lesser of two evils scenario.