noasark: (Well that didn't work)
Noa Kaiba ([personal profile] noasark) wrote2016-02-09 11:19 pm
Entry tags:

Ryslig IC INBOX

WELCOME TO YOUR PRIVATE CHANNEL, GREATFLOOD.

FOR SECURE COMMUNICATION, USE 950.04.933.05

*** GREATFLOOD has joined 950.04.933.05
<GREATFLOOD>This is the inbox of Noa Kaiba.
<GREATFLOOD>Leave a message, and I should reply shortly.
<GREATFLOOD>Undesirables will be banned.
heaven_sent: (22-1)

[personal profile] heaven_sent 2023-05-03 01:45 pm (UTC)(link)
1. We certainly aren't, though the catch was to do so in moderation. But it was always far easier to not partake unless there was reason to do so. Which mainly was, say, a glass of wine at dinner or at a family gathering.

2. Fiddleford? Formerly human, currently human, while we certainly did not embrace cannibalism, the fact that that was something historically done and was still being done in some cultures with little medical repercussions, it's merely morality that finds it wrong. Not that I would have done that outside of here, of course, but it is an interesting thought experiment at the very least. When the other option is losing the ability to control yourself, it certainly is a lesser of two evils scenario.
heaven_sent: (pic#16200290)

[personal profile] heaven_sent 2023-05-03 01:56 pm (UTC)(link)
1. Precisely.

2. That is the point of it, then. Merely to bring those who are morally opposed even to the end to accept their fate and do what is necessary. Funny how it always comes back to fate and the greater good no matter the topic.

2b. I know they came back, but I take it it wasn't the most pleasant of experiences? And the circle comes back around again, humans hunting and poaching what they consider "animals" and "inhuman". It never ends.
heaven_sent: (pic#16200280)

[personal profile] heaven_sent 2023-05-10 01:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I believe we have.

Pearl clutching over such a topic seems entirely useless and counter-productive, but what do I know when I'm perfectly fine with adjusting with it? I'm sure I would hear no end to people being aghast that a man of God would be taking this so well.

If I were keen on being more public than I already am.

... I wasn't aware that one could remain alive without a spine, considering it attaches to the brain? This serum was able to go against the natural way bodies function in order to keep someone alive? Were they in the same state of awareness as when whole or no?
heaven_sent: (pic#16200281)

[personal profile] heaven_sent 2023-05-10 01:51 pm (UTC)(link)
As if I'm going to starve myself and become unpredictable and cause more damage by doing so than merely doing what I need to in order to survive. Lesser of two evils, in a sense.

That is both distressing and fascinating, if I'm perfectly honest. It shouldn't be possible, shouldn't be something that should exist and yet there it is and in the hands of people who it shouldn't be.

But I shouldn't expect the same sort of logic I'm used to here, I do know that much.
heaven_sent: (pic#16200281)

[personal profile] heaven_sent 2023-06-05 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
I cannot say I disagree with you in the slightest. It's a fascinating thing in concept, but absolutely not something that should exist.

Years...

Normally I'd say I hope that isn't the case for me but, thinking on it for longer than a brief moment, perhaps this is still the better option.